Behind-the-Scene Efforts Seek to Bridge Differences Over Johannesburg Outcome:
Summit Seen as Vital for Future of Multilateralism
New York, 9 JulyInformal discussions between countries aimed at bridging
the remaining differences in the outcome document for the World Summit on
Sustainable Development have intensified since the end of the fourth and final
preparatory meeting in Bali, Indonesia, and Summit officials are hopeful that
the behind-the-scene efforts will pave the way for a successful Summit.
From the Group of Eight meeting near Calgary, Canada, to Rio de Janeiro, where
Brazil passed the Earth Summit "torch" to South Africa, to the
inaugural meeting of the African Union in Durban, the high-level talks have
centered on finding an approach to resolve the remaining outstanding issues,
which make up about a quarter of the outcome document.
At South Africa's request, high-level representatives of about 20 countries
will meet in New York on 17 July to map out such an approach that will allow
negotiators to find common ground on some of the most difficult issues, which
include finance and trade issues along with disagreements over setting targets
and timetables. The meeting will be led by South African Foreign Minister Dr.
Nkosazana Dlamini Zuma and United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan. The
meeting in New York will not be a negotiating meeting, as it does not involve
the whole membership of the United Nations. Nevertheless the talks can provide
the foundation for agreement at the Summit.
Interest is growing among Heads of State, according to Johannesburg
Secretary-General Nitin Desai, who added the Summit was "getting some
pretty big names. Part of the reason for increase in interest, Desai said, was
that the Summit is now seen as a major test for the future of multilaterism.
"Johannesburg should not be seen as only the follow-up for the
implementation of the Earth Summitit is also vital for the whole
framework of multilateralism."
In addition, Desai said, the Summit should take multilateralism to the
"next step" by including all the stakeholders, such as the corporate
sector, the NGOs, and the science community to participate in implementation
According to Desai, many of the concerns of developing countries were
"taken on board" at the World Trade Organization meeting in Doha,
Qatar, and at the International Conference on Financing for Development in
Monterrey, Mexico, where, he said, donor countries announced the largest
increase in official development assistance that has ever been seen. And in
Africa, Desai said the NEPAD initiative represented a positive step for
"In Johannesburg, we have to consolidate these gains," Desai said.
"We have to take multilateralism to the next step. We have to connect the
commitments made in Monterrey with the programme areas where the Summit is
focusing. The whole climate of multilateralism has changed."
"The real test is whether we can convince the world that great world
conferences can make a difference on the ground," Desai said.
Most of the text dealing with programme issues, such as water and sanitation,
health, energy, agricultural production, and biodiversity, has been agreed
upon, Desai said. The outstanding issues involve the differing ways people
interpret various concepts from Rio, such as "common but differentiated
responsibilities," which acknowledges that countries have different
capacities and resources to act, and the precautionary principle, which asks
people to take action before the risks are scientifically ascertained.
In addition, there are disagreements on finance and the follow-up of Monterrey,
on globalization and trade, good governance, and on targets and timetables. But
according to Desai, none of the disagreement is insuperable. Many
disagreements, he said, involved the formulation of language and the placement
For example, Desai said, there are competing proposals over whether to raise
the share of renewable energy to 5, 10 or 15 per cent over the coming years.
"Even if the phrase says 'substantially increase,' it is enough of a
mandate to go forward."
Copyright © United
Department of Economic and
Comments and suggestions
24 August 2006